Library Comparison

DomTrip offers unique advantages over traditional XML processing libraries. Here's how it compares to popular alternatives:

Feature Comparison

Feature DomTrip DOM4J JDOM Java DOM Jackson XML
Lossless Round-Trip ✅ Perfect ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No
Comment Preservation ✅ Full ✅ Yes ✅ Yes ✅ Yes ❌ No
Between-Element Whitespace ✅ Exact ⚠️ Partial ✅ Yes* ⚠️ Limited ❌ No
In-Element Whitespace ✅ Exact ❌ Lost ⚠️ Config** ⚠️ Limited ❌ No
Entity Preservation ✅ Perfect ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No
Attribute Quote Style ✅ Preserved ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No
Attribute Order ✅ Preserved ❌ Lost ❌ Lost ❌ Lost ❌ No
Modern Java API ✅ Java 17+ ❌ Legacy ❌ Legacy ❌ Legacy ✅ Modern
Fluent Builders ✅ Full ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No ⚠️ Limited
Stream Navigation ✅ Native ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No ❌ No
Namespace Support ✅ Comprehensive ✅ Good ✅ Good ✅ Good ⚠️ Basic
Performance ✅ Optimized ✅ Good ✅ Good ⚠️ Slow ✅ Fast

* JDOM: Use Format.getRawFormat() to preserve original whitespace between elements
** JDOM: Configure with TextMode.PRESERVE to maintain text content whitespace

Detailed Comparison

DomTrip vs DOM4J

DomTrip Advantages:

  • Perfect formatting preservation - DOM4J loses in-element whitespace and many formatting details
  • Modern API - Fluent builders, Stream navigation, Optional returns
  • Entity preservation - Maintains <, &, etc. exactly as written
  • Quote style preservation - Keeps single vs double quotes in attributes
  • Attribute order preservation - Maintains original attribute ordering

DOM4J Advantages:

  • Mature ecosystem - Longer history, more third-party integrations
  • XPath support - Built-in XPath query capabilities
  • Larger community - More Stack Overflow answers and tutorials
  • Comment preservation - Can preserve XML comments during processing

DomTrip vs JDOM

DomTrip Advantages:

  • Perfect lossless round-trip - JDOM with Format.getPrettyFormat() reformats everything
  • No configuration needed - Works losslessly out of the box
  • Entity and quote preservation - JDOM normalizes these during serialization
  • Better API design - Type-safe, fluent, modern Java patterns
  • Comprehensive namespace handling - Built-in namespace context and resolution

JDOM Advantages:

  • Configurable whitespace handling - Format.getRawFormat() can preserve between-element whitespace
  • Simplicity - Easier learning curve for basic XML processing
  • Lightweight - Smaller memory footprint for simple use cases
  • Wide adoption - Used in many existing projects
  • Comment preservation - Full support for XML comments

DomTrip vs Java DOM

DomTrip Advantages:

  • Much simpler API - No verbose factory patterns or checked exceptions
  • Perfect preservation - Java DOM loses many formatting details
  • Modern design - Built for Java 17+ with contemporary patterns
  • Better error handling - Specific exception types, clear error messages

Java DOM Advantages:

  • Built-in - Part of the JDK, no external dependencies
  • Standards compliant - Follows W3C DOM specification exactly
  • Universal support - Available everywhere Java runs

DomTrip vs Jackson XML

DomTrip Advantages:

  • Document-oriented - Designed for XML document editing, not object mapping
  • Formatting preservation - Jackson focuses on data binding, not formatting
  • Comment support - Jackson typically ignores comments
  • Manual control - Fine-grained control over XML structure

Jackson XML Advantages:

  • Object mapping - Automatic conversion between Java objects and XML
  • Performance - Optimized for high-throughput data processing
  • Annotation-driven - Declarative configuration via annotations
  • JSON compatibility - Can switch between XML and JSON easily

Use Case Recommendations

Choose DomTrip When:

  • ✅ Editing existing XML files (config files, POMs, etc.)
  • ✅ Building XML transformation tools
  • ✅ Creating XML editors or IDEs
  • ✅ Processing SOAP messages with formatting requirements
  • ✅ Maintaining XML document integrity

Choose DOM4J When:

  • ✅ Working with legacy codebases already using DOM4J
  • ✅ Need extensive XPath support
  • ✅ Processing XML for data extraction (formatting not important)

Choose JDOM When:

  • ✅ Simple XML processing tasks
  • ✅ Learning XML processing (easier API)
  • ✅ Memory-constrained environments

Choose Java DOM When:

  • ✅ No external dependencies allowed
  • ✅ Strict W3C DOM compliance required
  • ✅ Integration with other DOM-based tools

Choose Jackson XML When:

  • ✅ Object-to-XML mapping
  • ✅ High-performance data processing
  • ✅ REST API development
  • ✅ Need both JSON and XML support

Migration Guide

Migrating from other libraries to DomTrip is straightforward. Check out our Migration Guide for specific examples and patterns for each library.

Performance Comparison

Memory Usage

  • DomTrip: ~30% overhead for formatting metadata
  • DOM4J: Baseline memory usage
  • JDOM: ~20% less memory than DOM4J
  • Java DOM: ~50% more memory than DOM4J
  • Jackson XML: Minimal memory for streaming

Processing Speed

  • DomTrip: ~15% slower parsing, faster serialization for unmodified content
  • DOM4J: Good overall performance
  • JDOM: Similar to DOM4J
  • Java DOM: Significantly slower
  • Jackson XML: Fastest for data binding scenarios

Best Performance Use Cases

  • DomTrip: Configuration file editing, document transformation
  • DOM4J: General XML processing, XPath queries
  • JDOM: Simple XML manipulation
  • Java DOM: Standards compliance scenarios
  • Jackson XML: High-throughput data processing

Next Steps